Small telecoms blame OUR, C&W
for their collapse
...cont'd
In a written response to questions posed by the Business Observer,
C&W out its position on the issue:
"The company is indisputably the most regulated telecommunications
provider in the island and is constantly under the watchful eyes
of the Telecommunications regulator, the competition authority,
its competitors and the public," said the firm. "A substantive
example of the regulatory restrictions placed on C&W is the
fact that the Office of Utilities Regulations as the regulator must
approve C&W's rates for interconnection as well as for several
retail services."
Minette Palmer, a lawyer and telecom advisor to technology minister,
Phillip Paulwell, argues that the companies are looking to the wrong
reasons for their failure. It is actually the competitive environment
created by the deregulation process that has caused the fallout,
she argues. "A lot of persons came into the sector to trade
international minutes only, and many who started in the liberalised
environment were entrepreneurs drawn to the market by the high margins,"
Palmer told the Business Observer. "They came in with expectations
of low overheads and high margins but now it is a competitive environment,
and as prices moved down the margins disappeared." According
to Palmer, with high competition, those firms that lack the capital
to survive on very thin margins would naturally be forced from the
market. "People who didn't have the resources to withstand
that kind of assault had to get out," she said. "It used
to be expensive to make calls into and out of Jamaica - US$1 per
minute at one point. It went down to US$0.025 per minute in less
than a decade. That level of competition in a market is bound to
drive out some companies."
Termination rate is what is charged by a local network operator
to terminate an incoming call on its network. On the other hand,
settlement rate is the charge by the local international carrier
to the overseas carriers (eg AT&T and Sprint) to convey incoming
international minutes into Jamaica.
The settlement rate to the PSTN has fallen dramatically from a
high of US$0.625 per minute in 1999/2000 to an American-imposed
unilateral reduction to US$0.19 effective January 2001. This reduction
arouse out of the Report & Order on International Settlements,
issued by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) of the USA.
During the early stages of liberalisation in March 2003, the rate
was US$0.14, falling to US$0.017 by September 2004.
The November 2004 approval of the US$0.025 rate in the fifth version
of the Reference Interconnection Offer (RIO5) saw an increase in
the settlement rates to an average of just under US$0.035 per minute,
with the rates from the primary markets of US, Canada and UK being
as low as US$0.026. C&W suggested that it was not surprised
by the fallout given the reduction in rates, and the fact that the
newer entrants to the market had been piggy-backing on its network.
"Since March 2003 the focus of the newly licensed international
carriers has been "piggy-backing" on the C&W PSTN,"
said the telecoms. "The consequence of the current regime is
that the international carriers have been in the business of negotiating
settlement rates that are marginally higher than termination rate."
Siska however insists that some firms, including his, could have
competed at very low margins but were unwilling to continue operating
in an environment fraught with uncertainty.
"The telecoms industry in general has had decreasing margins
but if you had certainty in the market [regulations], companies
could work with small margins," Siska said. The OUR's Jackson
has another perspective - believing that the industry had reached
a point of stability at the beginning of this year, and contends
that level at which international settlement rates stabilised had
discouraged the smaller operators.
"In stabilising market fluctuations in the settlement rate,
one of the problems was in relation to cost-based termination on
local networks, which had not been finalised before the conclusion
of a cost study," Jackson told the Business Observer.
"During that time," he added, "the OUR attempted
to take some interim decisions pending the conclusion of the cost-based
rates, which perhaps caused some difficulties in the trade. There
has been stabilisation since the last determination in February
of this year (2005), but the level at which prices have stabilised
seems to be causing problems for the smaller operators."
But Mike Dawson, the acting chief executive officer of People's
Telecoms, largely agrees with Siska, although his firm, which uses
Jamaican cultural icons to brand its calling card, has managed to
remain in operation.
Nonetheless, says Dawson, People's Telecoms has been hurt on several
occasions due to sudden regulation changes. The most recent of these,
he says, was in June, with the imposition of a cess on international
telephone calls termination in Jamaica - US$0.03 per minute to fixed
wire and US$0.02 per minute to mobile.
"Since the cess, we had to let people go and reduce our Canadian
operations to a skeleton," Dawson told the Business Observer.
"So far, the hit we have taken is in the millions. I had to
take down all my flyers advertising the rates, maintain our published
rates for a period of time and make reductions gradually. So we
will sustain a loss until the end of August."
Dawson charges that there were undeclared motives behind the cess,
which the government says will be used to finance e-learning in
Jamaican schools.
"I think the cess was set up to eliminate discount carriers,
those are carriers who maintain low overheads in order to provide
low prices," he says. "The cess was agreed by the Big
Three and introduced after the fact. If the environment continues
in the same vein, the industry will return to a duopoly."
The Big Three to which he referred are Cable & Wireless, Digicel
and the third, but smaller mobile phone company, Oceanic Digital
(MiPhone). Leon McCalla, who owned a company called Callworks which
is among those that failed, blames the failure on regulation.
|